5 thoughts on “Why do you lose money when buying stocks”
Tammy
This year's A -share market specializes in various dissatisfaction. In Guizhou Maotai, 1,200 yuan, to Hengrui Pharmaceutical of 99 times P / E ratio, to 300 billion market value soy sauce stocks. The white horse stocks may disappoint you. Only the core assets of the consumer industry are stable happiness. It, from the perspective of valuation in the traditional sense, the large consumer sector is not cheap whether the P / E ratio (PE) or the market ratio (PB) (PB): la It has reached 68%of historical percentage, PB is 6.5 times, reaching 81%of historical percentage; ② Segment the white wine sector's price -earnings ratio is as high as 32.17 times, which is much higher than the historical average level. is the valuation of consumer stocks too high? The latest release of Guotai Junan Retail Team "Adhere to consumer leaders and share China's growth", which detailed the transformation of consumer stock valuation logic. The 2303 words in this article. It is expected to read for 10 minutes. Pull to the bottom of this article, you can read the core point of view of this article. Remember the "Beautiful 50" in the United States? It to discuss whether the valuation of consumer white horse stocks is too high, we may wish to review the "beautiful 50" market in the early 1970s. The so -called "Beautiful 50" refers to the 50 large -cap stocks that are highly sought after in the New York Stock Exchange from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. There are many of them who are still familiar with the consumer brand. Such as McDonald's, Coca -Cola and so on. The main feature of "Beautiful 50" is that high profit and high PE exist at the same time, and literally translate into "very expensive good stocks". since 1971, the stock price and valuation level of "Beautiful 50" rose rapidly. At the end of 1972, the valuation was more than 40 times. The median value is only 12 times. But on the other hand, the return on investment in "Beautiful 50" is also very amazing. From June 1970 to the end of 1972, the "Beautiful 50" index rose 89%, which obtained 35%over revenue compared to the S
Because speculating stocks are speculative activities. In speculative activities, people will continue to determine a certain view with their own abilities, so as to make operations. It is the failure of the operating system).
It, the money is cost at the least, at least, to win the interest and CPI of the bank. Many of the stocks bought in 2001 and 2002 are from 2006, 2007, or even now. I haven't solved it yet. Think about how much increase in 7 or 8 years to catch up with the bank interest CPI index. How can this be considered to make money and not make money.
In the last thing to say, the method of playing stocks proposed by the landlord is not called speculation, the operation method and idea are equivalent to depositing banks.
Teacher Li Yongle mentioned in the first video that many retail investors lost money because of the dealer's operation, but in fact, the retail investor lost money because of the speculation of the theme stock and was killed by the dealer? Obviously not, let's talk about the reasons for retail investors to lose money from the deviation and fallacy of psychology.
n00:00 / 05: 2970% shortcut keys to describe space: Play / suspend ESC: exit full screen ↑: increase volume 10% ↓: reduced volume decrease by 10% →: single fast forward 5 seconds ←: single fast retreat 5 seconds Press hold up and hold it up. Here you can drag no longer appear in the player settings to reopen the small window shortcut key description
The landlord said nothing wrong. If you insist on not selling, you will not lose money. But in fact, it is impossible for everyone to operate so idealized, and various factors may cause losses to sell
Your thoughts are really good, but most people think so, if you think so complicated. Most people are better than you think. Really, what you think is not perfect. It turned out that 60 yuan in Sichuan Changhong 10 years ago, now see how much money, losing money and losing interest. Such an example can be cited.
This year's A -share market specializes in various dissatisfaction.
In Guizhou Maotai, 1,200 yuan, to Hengrui Pharmaceutical of 99 times P / E ratio, to 300 billion market value soy sauce stocks.
The white horse stocks may disappoint you. Only the core assets of the consumer industry are stable happiness.
It, from the perspective of valuation in the traditional sense, the large consumer sector is not cheap whether the P / E ratio (PE) or the market ratio (PB) (PB):
la It has reached 68%of historical percentage, PB is 6.5 times, reaching 81%of historical percentage;
② Segment the white wine sector's price -earnings ratio is as high as 32.17 times, which is much higher than the historical average level.
is the valuation of consumer stocks too high?
The latest release of Guotai Junan Retail Team "Adhere to consumer leaders and share China's growth", which detailed the transformation of consumer stock valuation logic.
The 2303 words in this article. It is expected to read for 10 minutes. Pull to the bottom of this article, you can read the core point of view of this article.
Remember the "Beautiful 50" in the United States?
It to discuss whether the valuation of consumer white horse stocks is too high, we may wish to review the "beautiful 50" market in the early 1970s.
The so -called "Beautiful 50" refers to the 50 large -cap stocks that are highly sought after in the New York Stock Exchange from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. There are many of them who are still familiar with the consumer brand. Such as McDonald's, Coca -Cola and so on.
The main feature of "Beautiful 50" is that high profit and high PE exist at the same time, and literally translate into "very expensive good stocks".
since 1971, the stock price and valuation level of "Beautiful 50" rose rapidly. At the end of 1972, the valuation was more than 40 times. The median value is only 12 times.
But on the other hand, the return on investment in "Beautiful 50" is also very amazing. From June 1970 to the end of 1972, the "Beautiful 50" index rose 89%, which obtained 35%over revenue compared to the S
Because speculating stocks are speculative activities. In speculative activities, people will continue to determine a certain view with their own abilities, so as to make operations. It is the failure of the operating system).
It, the money is cost at the least, at least, to win the interest and CPI of the bank. Many of the stocks bought in 2001 and 2002 are from 2006, 2007, or even now. I haven't solved it yet. Think about how much increase in 7 or 8 years to catch up with the bank interest CPI index. How can this be considered to make money and not make money.
In the last thing to say, the method of playing stocks proposed by the landlord is not called speculation, the operation method and idea are equivalent to depositing banks.
Teacher Li Yongle mentioned in the first video that many retail investors lost money because of the dealer's operation, but in fact, the retail investor lost money because of the speculation of the theme stock and was killed by the dealer? Obviously not, let's talk about the reasons for retail investors to lose money from the deviation and fallacy of psychology.
n00:00 / 05: 2970% shortcut keys to describe space: Play / suspend ESC: exit full screen ↑: increase volume 10% ↓: reduced volume decrease by 10% →: single fast forward 5 seconds ←: single fast retreat 5 seconds Press hold up and hold it up. Here you can drag no longer appear in the player settings to reopen the small window shortcut key description
The landlord said nothing wrong. If you insist on not selling, you will not lose money. But in fact, it is impossible for everyone to operate so idealized, and various factors may cause losses to sell
Your thoughts are really good, but most people think so, if you think so complicated. Most people are better than you think. Really, what you think is not perfect. It turned out that 60 yuan in Sichuan Changhong 10 years ago, now see how much money, losing money and losing interest. Such an example can be cited.